
Channel A 'Detectives' Trade Secrets' revealed shocking mother-in-law and daughter-in-law conflicts and infidelity cases that left viewers stunned. This was due to the meticulous battle of wits between a husband unable to stop his affair and a daughter-in-law trying to seize her in-laws' wealth by exploiting it.
On the 23rd, in the 'Case Notebook' segment, a famous couple counseling expert, Mr. A, appeared as a client. Mr. A had previously paid a large sum in alimony to his daughter-in-law to cover up the incident during his son's first affair, fearing damage to his reputation. However, his son's habit of infidelity did not change even after remarrying.
The problem escalated two years later after remarrying a woman with a pharmacy background. The son exhibited irrational behavior, such as enjoying secret meetings at home with his wife's friend or continuing to meet his ex-wife, who he had already divorced. However, the investigation by the detective agency revealed that behind all these situations was the daughter-in-law's 'scheme'.
The daughter-in-law identified her husband's 'infidelity addiction' and used it as a tool to take away her mother-in-law's wealth. She intentionally brought her husband to alumni gatherings to create connections with her friends or lured him to places where he would inevitably run into his ex-wife, meticulously setting the stage for 'affairs.'
Ultimately, the daughter-in-law successfully used evidence of her husband's infidelity to change the ownership of an apartment in her mother-in-law's name to joint ownership with her husband. Furthermore, she had even established a concrete plan to relocate the pharmacy she received support for during their marriage to Gangnam. When her identity was exposed, the daughter-in-law displayed a defiant attitude, saying, "A dog can't stop being a dog," implying that her husband was more at fault for biting the bait she had thrown.
In the end, the son faced a second divorce, and mother-in-law Mr. A concluded the matter by paying a large settlement to the second daughter-in-law and obtaining a confidentiality agreement to protect her career. The son's instinct for infidelity, which even his expert mother could not stop, and the daughter-in-law's ruthless desire to exploit the gap left a bitter taste.










